Runboard.com
You're welcome.

runboard.com       Sign up (learn about it) | Sign in (lost password?)


 
Noserose Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Head Administrator
Global user

Registered: 11-2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 3514
Karma: 10 (+21/-11)
Reply | Quote
Row Over Device That Identifies "Gay Faces":


Row Over Device That Identifies "Gay Faces":

A facial recognition experiment that claims to be able to distinguish between gay and heterosexual people has sparked a row between its creators and two leading LGBT rights groups.

[sign in to see URL]

[Why would they pick a minority group for an experiment like this? Are they looking for a facial recognition system to identify gays when workers are being hired? Perhaps to arrest them and put them in jail? Or worse? There is something not right about all [sign in to see URL]'t you think?]


---
--------------------------------------------------------------
"libido sciendi"..... the passion to know.
9/13/2017, 9:08 am Link to this post PM Noserose
 
Bellelettres Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user
Global user

Registered: 11-2008
Posts: 1060
Karma: 4 (+11/-7)
Reply | Quote
Re: Row Over Device That Identifies "Gay Faces":


I'm not understanding this. How can it be called valid unless the results are 100 percent?
9/13/2017, 1:13 pm Link to this post PM Bellelettres
 
Rigby5 Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user
Global user (premium)

Registered: 04-2005
Location: Mountain Time
Posts: 5503
Karma: 5 (+20/-15)
Reply | Quote
Re: Row Over Device That Identifies "Gay Faces":


--Log in or sign up to see linked image content--

Silly program because that is correlating with hormone level superficial images, and I know many people, myself included, who are reversed of their conclusions.
9/14/2017, 2:46 am Link to this post PM Rigby5
 
katie5445 Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Administrator
Global user

Registered: 10-2016
Posts: 3649
Karma: 16 (+27/-11)
Reply | Quote
Re: Row Over Device That Identifies "Gay Faces":


quote:

Bellelettres wrote:

I'm not understanding this. How can it be called valid unless the results are 100 percent?



Valid studies aren't 100% they always have failures as many of the clients have health issues that come up during the study and whether it is related or not the study must include them.

Also this shouldn't be considered a study by Stanford University but the researchers, all across this country researchers are hired by universities with some very funky views as we have seen in climatology and other subjects. They are funded as any scientist is, funky or not, funky might come up with something positive for human kind, although the waste of many of these studies come to nothing and I would imagine billions have been wasted.
9/14/2017, 5:20 am Link to this post PM katie5445 Blog
 


Add a reply





You are not logged in (login)
Back To Top