Runboard.com
You're welcome.





runboard.com       Sign up (learn about it) | Sign in (lost password?)

Page:  1  2  3 

 
shiftless2 Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user

Registered: 11-2016
Posts: 2548
Karma: 29 (+34/-5)
Reply | Quote
Re: MORE PROFITS from the Mueller Investigation


cooter, learn something about the law before you make statements like that.

Collusion is not a crime. However, obstructing justice is. And any number of prosecutors have said that if Trump was not the sitting President he would have been charged.
6/7/2019, 5:57 pm Link to this post PM shiftless2 Blog
 
katie5445 Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Administrator

Registered: 10-2016
Posts: 6301
Karma: 31 (+46/-15)
Reply | Quote
Re: MORE PROFITS from the Mueller Investigation


Collusion can or not be a crime, what Trump was accused of. was a crime. Is there something conservatives do not understand by Muellers statement" if we had confidence the president did NOT commit a crime we would have said so." Explain that away Cooter with some faux English."Cad" in the room, hey I like a good laugh as well, this isnt it.
6/8/2019, 7:26 am Link to this post PM katie5445 Blog
 
cooter50 Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user

Registered: 11-2016
Posts: 4312
Karma: 2 (+15/-13)
Reply | Quote
Re: MORE PROFITS from the Mueller Investigation


There was "NO Collusion" as noted by Mr. Mueller or did you Not read that report and the written record of his announcement?

He noted his team had no confidence(NOT Evidence) the POTUS did not commit a crime and the VERY NEXT Statement was that the 'Did Not however make a determination the president DID commit a crime.

So where is YOUR evidence that Mueller and the FBI and the DoJ investigating staff could NOT find?
6/8/2019, 1:31 pm Link to this post PM cooter50 Blog
 
Geezesss Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user

Registered: 04-2019
Posts: 358
Karma: 0 (+0/-0)
Reply | Quote
Re: MORE PROFITS from the Mueller Investigation


So in other words, he said what is not, in itself, a crime, was not committed, but what did he say about obstruction of justice, which is a crime ?

Do you know ?
6/8/2019, 6:21 pm Link to this post PM Geezesss Blog
 
cooter50 Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user

Registered: 11-2016
Posts: 4312
Karma: 2 (+15/-13)
Reply | Quote
Re: MORE PROFITS from the Mueller Investigation


He "Stated" everything he had was "in his report", if not there was not going to be forthcoming as NOT left out, which was a lie as he has been caught leaving a KEY witness testimony out.

So go fish as the water is gone and no fish left to snag.
6/8/2019, 8:45 pm Link to this post PM cooter50 Blog
 
Geezesss Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user

Registered: 04-2019
Posts: 358
Karma: 0 (+0/-0)
Reply | Quote
Re: MORE PROFITS from the Mueller Investigation


"He "Stated" everything he had was "in his report"
... which is too long and complex for Trump or his supporters to read , right ?

Here:

“While this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.”

“The evidence supports the inference that the President intended (former campaign Chairman Paul) Manafort to believe that he could receive a pardon, which would make cooperation with the government as a means of obtaining a lesser sentence unnecessary.”

“You gotta do this. You gotta call Rod ...,” Trump told former White House Counsel Donald McGahn during a June 17, 2017, phone call in which he asked McGahn to remove Mueller due to conflicts of interest.

“Call Rod, tell Rod that Mueller has conflicts and can’t be the Special Counsel,” Trump said during a second phone call that same day. “Mueller has to go. ... Call me back when you do it.”

“I don’t have a lawyer,” Trump told aides on March 3, 2017, the day after learning that Attorney General Jeff Sessions had recused himself from the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election.

“You’re telling me that Bobby “While this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.”

“The evidence supports the inference that the President intended (former campaign Chairman Paul) Manafort to believe that he could receive a pardon, which would make cooperation with the government as a means of obtaining a lesser sentence unnecessary.”

“You gotta do this. You gotta call Rod ...,” Trump told former White House Counsel Donald McGahn during a June 17, 2017, phone call in which he asked McGahn to remove Mueller due to conflicts of interest.

“Call Rod, tell Rod that Mueller has conflicts and can’t be the Special Counsel,” Trump said during a second phone call that same day. “Mueller has to go. ... Call me back when you do it.”

“I don’t have a lawyer,” Trump told aides on March 3, 2017, the day after learning that Attorney General Jeff Sessions had recused himself from the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election.

“You’re telling me that Bobby (Kennedy) and Jack (Kennedy didn’t talk about investigations? Or Obama didn’t tell Eric (Attorney General Eric) Holder who to investigate?” Trump asked McGahn in connection with frustration over Sessions’ recusal.

“Can you look into this? Don’t want to get duped but don’t want to blow off Putin!” - former Trump campaign secretary Hope Hicks, in an email to Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner, after receiving an email from a Russian Embassy official with the subject line “Message from Putin.”

“If he doesn’t write a letter, then maybe I’ll have to get rid of him,” - Trump, telling Staff Secretary Rob Porter that he would fire White House Counsel McGahn if McGahn refused to craft a memo stating that Trump never directed him to fire Special Counsel Robert Mueller. Trump also called McGahn a “lying bastard,” according to Porter’s account.

“Keep in touch with your friend.” - Trump, in directing Porter to keep in touch with former Associate Attorney General Rachel Brand to see if she might be interested in becoming attorney general and overseeing Mueller’s probe.

Porter later told prosecutors he never delivered the message because he was uncomfortable.

“I never said to fire Mueller. I never said ‘fire.’ This story doesn’t look good. You need to correct this. You’re the White House counsel.” - Trump, complaining to McGahn about a New York Times story revealing that Trump asked McGahn to fire Mueller. McGahn declined to do so, saying the story was accurate.
6/9/2019, 6:29 pm Link to this post PM Geezesss Blog
 
katie5445 Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Administrator

Registered: 10-2016
Posts: 6301
Karma: 31 (+46/-15)
Reply | Quote
Re: MORE PROFITS from the Mueller Investigation


quote:

cooter50 wrote:

There was "NO Collusion" as noted by Mr. Mueller or did you Not read that report and the written record of his announcement?

He noted his team had no confidence(NOT Evidence) the POTUS did not commit a crime and the VERY NEXT Statement was that the 'Did Not however make a determination the president DID commit a crime.

So where is YOUR evidence that Mueller and the FBI and the DoJ investigating staff could NOT find?



First I already agreed there was "no collusion" get over that bit. He stated, "If we had confidence that the president had NOT committed a crime, we would have said so." You'd have to be deaf, dumb and blind to not know what that meant!
6/12/2019, 1:47 am Link to this post PM katie5445 Blog
 
cooter50 Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user

Registered: 11-2016
Posts: 4312
Karma: 2 (+15/-13)
Reply | Quote
Re: MORE PROFITS from the Mueller Investigation


NO you have to be PARANOID or deranged to read INTO that comment.
6/13/2019, 1:30 am Link to this post PM cooter50 Blog
 
Geezesss Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user

Registered: 04-2019
Posts: 358
Karma: 0 (+0/-0)
Reply | Quote
Re: MORE PROFITS from the Mueller Investigation


No.
Just no.
6/13/2019, 2:51 pm Link to this post PM Geezesss Blog
 
katie5445 Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Administrator

Registered: 10-2016
Posts: 6301
Karma: 31 (+46/-15)
Reply | Quote
Re: MORE PROFITS from the Mueller Investigation


quote:

cooter50 wrote:

NO you have to be PARANOID or deranged to read INTO that comment.



Actually it is plain English.
6/14/2019, 1:03 am Link to this post PM katie5445 Blog
 


Add a reply

Page:  1  2  3 





You are not logged in (login)