Runboard.com
You're welcome.





runboard.com       Sign up (learn about it) | Sign in (lost password?)

Page:  1  2  3  4  5 

 
cooter50 Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user

Registered: 11-2016
Posts: 4312
Karma: 2 (+15/-13)
Reply | Quote
Basic Hypocrisy


Liberals called for and protested as to the Refusal of a Businessman to provide service to a LGBT Customer, they CONTINUE to fire suits at this business as Discriminatory , in the Same breath the owner of Red Hen on the East Coast is lauded for REFUSING SERVICE and asking a prominent politician to leave. The hypocrisy of the LEFT stands unquestioned.
7/4/2019, 1:24 pm Link to this post PM cooter50 Blog
 
shiftless2 Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user

Registered: 11-2016
Posts: 2548
Karma: 29 (+34/-5)
Reply | Quote
Re: Basic Hypocrisy


The two are not comparable. But you knew that before you posted.
7/4/2019, 9:18 pm Link to this post PM shiftless2 Blog
 
cooter50 Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user

Registered: 11-2016
Posts: 4312
Karma: 2 (+15/-13)
Reply | Quote
Re: Basic Hypocrisy


Then explain HOW. Refusal of Service is Refusal of service.

The LGBT persons were refused and determined to enter lawsuit. Sarah was refused service and REQUESTED SHE LEAVE, how is that different?

Last edited by cooter50, 7/5/2019, 12:50 am
7/5/2019, 12:49 am Link to this post PM cooter50 Blog
 
Philer Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user

Registered: 12-2016
Posts: 4467
Karma: 26 (+29/-3)
Reply | Quote
Re: Basic Hypocrisy


quote:

cooter50 wrote:

Then explain HOW. Refusal of Service is Refusal of service.

The LGBT persons were refused and determined to enter lawsuit. Sarah was refused service and REQUESTED SHE LEAVE, how is that different?



Perhaps shiftless believes that since the refusal to serve a political figure was based on her individual views rather than her category as a human being that it qualifies as a very different situation.

The problem is that there isn't always a way to do that and get away with it. If some restaurant refused to serve a Muslim for his views on how women should be treated or his stand on homosexuality that would be classed as illegal discrimination rather than taking a stand for women and homosexuals.

Perhaps restaurants should just let customers be customers and treat them well as long as they pay their bill.

Last edited by Philer, 7/5/2019, 1:01 am
7/5/2019, 12:59 am Link to this post PM Philer Blog
 
cooter50 Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user

Registered: 11-2016
Posts: 4312
Karma: 2 (+15/-13)
Reply | Quote
Re: Basic Hypocrisy


My very point.
7/5/2019, 11:24 am Link to this post PM cooter50 Blog
 
cooter50 Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user

Registered: 11-2016
Posts: 4312
Karma: 2 (+15/-13)
Reply | Quote
Re: Basic Hypocrisy


I just realized Shifty's theory. The LGBT were Liberals being discriminated by a Conservative whereas Sarah was a Conservative Discriminated by a Liberal. My EXACT Point as to the Hypocrisy of the Democrat Left Libreturds.
7/5/2019, 3:44 pm Link to this post PM cooter50 Blog
 
katie5445 Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Administrator

Registered: 10-2016
Posts: 6301
Karma: 31 (+46/-15)
Reply | Quote
Re: Basic Hypocrisy


Umm, she was discriminated against because she discriminates, it was called back at you. Neither do people want to break bread with a mean liar and she was mean(for Philer I won't use the "B" word but I'm thinking it) My house has always been an open door and seldom have I ever put my foot down who I would feed or not, she would be one I wouldn't, well unless she was starving.....you treat people badly, they don't want you around.
7/6/2019, 2:47 am Link to this post PM katie5445 Blog
 
cooter50 Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user

Registered: 11-2016
Posts: 4312
Karma: 2 (+15/-13)
Reply | Quote
Re: Basic Hypocrisy


WHEN did Sarah Discriminate?

Link


And What does a Restaurant have to do with pressing issue on discrimination when THEY then discriminate. Not so simple while STILL Hypocritical.
7/6/2019, 2:34 pm Link to this post PM cooter50 Blog
 
Philer Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user

Registered: 12-2016
Posts: 4467
Karma: 26 (+29/-3)
Reply | Quote
Re: Basic Hypocrisy


quote:

katie5445 wrote:

Umm, she was discriminated against because she discriminates, it was called back at you. Neither do people want to break bread with a mean liar and she was mean(for Philer I won't use the "B" word but I'm thinking it) My house has always been an open door and seldom have I ever put my foot down who I would feed or not, she would be one I wouldn't, well unless she was starving.....you treat people badly, they don't want you around.



Thanks for not using the "B" word. As you know I consider it the equivalent of the "N" word in the world of insults.

As for Sarah, I consider tossing her out of a restaurant a bit of an overreaction to her views. I wouldn't have done that. I much prefer discussing somebody's views rather than kicking them out of a place over them.
7/8/2019, 11:29 pm Link to this post PM Philer Blog
 
cooter50 Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user

Registered: 11-2016
Posts: 4312
Karma: 2 (+15/-13)
Reply | Quote
Re: Basic Hypocrisy


According to the Hypocritical Left a Business CANNOT Discriminate in any form and MUST serve the patron, or at least LGBTQ crowds in CO.
So no one has submitted the Discrimination Evidence by Sarah, where is it? Could NOT be that a Libreturd Business owner did not wish to Serve a Conservative. That WOULD be Discriminatory.
7/9/2019, 11:19 pm Link to this post PM cooter50 Blog
 


Add a reply

Page:  1  2  3  4  5 





You are not logged in (login)