Runboard.com
Слава Україні!

runboard.com       Sign up (learn about it) | Sign in (lost password?)

Page:  1  2  3 ... 7  8  9  10  11 ... 13  14  15 

 
Geezess Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user

Registered: 11-2016
Posts: 3067
Karma: 12 (+17/-5)
Reply | Quote
Re: So if you see what a certain theory predicted happening, right before your own eyes ...


Image


Another week another hurricane on US territory:

Image

Last edited by Geezess, 9/17/2017, 5:32 am
9/17/2017, 5:28 am Link to this post PM Geezess Blog
 
Geezess Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user

Registered: 11-2016
Posts: 3067
Karma: 12 (+17/-5)
Reply | Quote
Re: So if you see what a certain theory predicted happening, right before your own eyes ...


So please correlate your "sunspots" theory with these observations, Cooter :

Following last year's massive die-off of Alaskan seabirds, scientists still looking for answers

http://www.ktuu.com/content/news/Following-last-years-massive-die-off-of-Alaskan-seabirds-scientists-still-looking-for-answers-413757753.html

“About 30,000 carcasses were counted in some way or another, but we know only a small percentage of those that die actually make it to the beach. Nobody has generated a useful total estimate, I would say possibly hundreds of thousands were killed.”

And it’s not just how many died, it’s where they died. “There were some in Lake Iliamna, down on the roads along the Kenai Peninsula, and all the way up to Fairbanks. Murres aren’t supposed to be there,” Kuletz said.

“Almost always it’s been starvation, so it’s clear the birds haven’t been able to find the kind of food that they need. They are relatively large, they have to eat a large percentage of their body mass every day, so they need a lot of food,” Renner said.

But why are the murres starving? Murres primarily eat small forage fish like pollock, a staple in Alaskan commercial fishing. The lack of pollock is where the situation gets murkier.

“It seems very likely that there’s a warm water link to this, but there’s no definitive proof to that. We have observed warm water, and we know that the birds have had a hard time finding food,” Renner said.

Kuletz agrees, saying that the long term trend of ocean waters is a continual warming pattern. “If you look at the long term trend, it continues to warm. And certainly the last couple years have been some of the warmest ever recorded. If you look at the long term, [the die-off] certainly looks related to climate change.”

 ... and it is happening AGAIN, this year.



Last edited by Geezess, 9/17/2017, 8:17 pm
9/17/2017, 8:11 pm Link to this post PM Geezess Blog
 
cooter50 Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user

Registered: 11-2016
Posts: 4312
Karma: 2 (+15/-13)
Reply | Quote
Re: So if you see what a certain theory predicted happening, right before your own eyes ...


Cherry Picking and Cherry Picked data, work with ALL the availed inputs or its garbage science cherry picked to 'Fit a desired effect'.

 Science Denier
9/17/2017, 8:15 pm Link to this post PM cooter50 Blog
 
Geezess Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user

Registered: 11-2016
Posts: 3067
Karma: 12 (+17/-5)
Reply | Quote
Re: So if you see what a certain theory predicted happening, right before your own eyes ...


How is your sun spot theory not exactly that, too ?

It does even explain the data we are seeing.
9/17/2017, 8:18 pm Link to this post PM Geezess Blog
 
cooter50 Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user

Registered: 11-2016
Posts: 4312
Karma: 2 (+15/-13)
Reply | Quote
Re: So if you see what a certain theory predicted happening, right before your own eyes ...


It is but ONE of many and I state MANY points I accept by Science Facts as to derived components driving climate on our planet. I do not put a whole lot of stock in claims that derive from the context of a 'few' points to ponder where the scenarios they claim to play and attest as to 'Will come' predictions that fail to materialize or those that claim weather phenomena are evidence but in the same breath state singular weather events the other direction 'Do not count'.

You Denier of science facts. Have to use them all as inputs or is Garbage Science.
9/17/2017, 8:32 pm Link to this post PM cooter50 Blog
 
Geezess Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user

Registered: 11-2016
Posts: 3067
Karma: 12 (+17/-5)
Reply | Quote
Re: So if you see what a certain theory predicted happening, right before your own eyes ...


" I accept by Science Facts as to derived components driving climate on our planet."

How lonely is it getting be so very wrong ?

Look, no one is fooled by your political motives. You are wacked to talk about me posting cherry picked examples, as I pull in all sorts of evidence, while you use your singular no compromise political motivate weak theory ... the science grant whores politically motivated obstructionist cororate sponsored BS, and then imply I'm not morally incorrect to cherry pick, like you always do.
You are a one trick pony, on a cherry picker,

 Image

G'day.

Last edited by Geezess, 9/17/2017, 8:47 pm
9/17/2017, 8:45 pm Link to this post PM Geezess Blog
 
Geezess Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user

Registered: 11-2016
Posts: 3067
Karma: 12 (+17/-5)
Reply | Quote
Re: So if you see what a certain theory predicted happening, right before your own eyes ...


"Yet as noted our "Angry" Sun has been dramatic... " Cooter.

Well, okay, so, boss-man, is it time to sacrifice a virgin, to him, again, then ?

Well, I don't abide that treatment of women, but of course I have no right to interfere with your religious beliefs nor your practice of them.

So she, the virgin, had better be part of the elitist priest, the one who puts the knife in, family, THIS TIME !!!

and .. and happy Indigenous People's Day, in advance, Cooter . emoticon

 

9/19/2017, 8:44 pm Link to this post PM Geezess Blog
 
cooter50 Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user

Registered: 11-2016
Posts: 4312
Karma: 2 (+15/-13)
Reply | Quote
Re: So if you see what a certain theory predicted happening, right before your own eyes ...


No but the Climate Shriekers as you need to set back and INTERPRET ALL the availed data not just those that suit a 'Need' to be showing that Human causes are THE causes, there are a multitude of other inputs to the equation and DENYING those changes the formula DRASTICALLY.
9/20/2017, 12:03 am Link to this post PM cooter50 Blog
 
Geezess Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user

Registered: 11-2016
Posts: 3067
Karma: 12 (+17/-5)
Reply | Quote
Re: So if you see what a certain theory predicted happening, right before your own eyes ...


quote:

Geezess wrote:

And where do you receive heat from Geezes, you make it from free air?? The Sun is the master of the equation and you Deny Deny Deny. As usual.

Now ?
Both from the sun and all of the old carbon that we are burning.

Now, talk about where it is supposed to go as opposed where it stays as function of both isolation and insulation due to man made green house gases,

Can you ?
Will you you ?
 

It is not rocket science, but NASA does explain it, for you.

See: https://climate.nasa.gov/causes/

 


 Talk about where it is supposed to go as opposed where it stays as function of both isolation and insulation due to man made green house gases,

Can you ?
Will you you ?
Have you yet ?
9/21/2017, 2:32 am Link to this post PM Geezess Blog
 
cooter50 Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user

Registered: 11-2016
Posts: 4312
Karma: 2 (+15/-13)
Reply | Quote
Re: So if you see what a certain theory predicted happening, right before your own eyes ...


ADD ALL the availed inputs or the data stream is INVALID except to make a point in a direction someone wishes to see.

The current Computers can not accept ALL the available inputs as to Climate Change where they lock up or run wild in too many alternative directions which if cannot be trusted to a finite decision the scientists remove enough points to come to ANY FIXED determination which in essence is INVALID as it does not include ALL data available.

Add ONLY CO2 and the points go to one referenced direction, add more inputs where deviations occur begins rendering Opinions and Valued Studies as well Egos worthless. Scientists have reputations to maintain, Regardless the outcomes they can fall back to "It was just Theory of the time" or the Computers were in error as to values or any of another dozen caveats I have heard in the decades since the 1970's scares even as it was Incomplete as to availed inputs by these Reputable scientist.
9/21/2017, 11:13 am Link to this post PM cooter50 Blog
 


Add a reply

Page:  1  2  3 ... 7  8  9  10  11 ... 13  14  15 





You are not logged in (login)