Runboard.com
Слава Україні!

runboard.com       Sign up (learn about it) | Sign in (lost password?)

Page:  1  2  3  4  5 

 
Bellelettres Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user

Registered: 11-2008
Posts: 2049
Karma: 11 (+22/-11)
Reply | Quote
Re: Hillary in the 'News'


I'll let you say it for us, Katie. You can put it much better than I can.
9/14/2017, 5:57 pm Link to this post PM Bellelettres
 
Rigby5 Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user

Registered: 04-2005
Location: Mountain Time
Posts: 6799
Karma: -5 (+26/-31)
Reply | Quote
Re: Hillary in the 'News'


quote:

Bellelettres wrote:

Wrong, Rigby. He announced the new e-mails 11 days before the election, but said nothing was there only 2 days before the election -- 9 days to let the charge sink in, only 2 to get the word out that there was nothing there. The damage he did is indisputable. In those 9 days people who had already voted for Hillary said they would like to take their votes back. Trump was announcing that they COULD take their votes back. Don't you all remember that?

Oct. 28, 2016

Comey announced that new emails had been discovered on the laptop of former New York Rep. Anthony Weiner, who was married to top Clinton aide Huma Abedin, and that messages may be related to the Clinton probe. His announcement came 11 days before Election Day.

Nov. 6, 2016

Two days before the presidential election, Comey wrote a letter to lawmakers saying that the FBI's previous decision not to recommend charges against Clinton over her emails would stand.

http://tinyurl.com/yauu7gsm




That is not the way I remember it. I remember it being just over a week end.
But even if you are correct, who would ever have assumed the Weiner's laptop would have any thing significant, except maybe more of his dick pics?
Announcing that more evidence turned up is not at all implying what the evidence contained. So I don't see how it could be damaging?
9/15/2017, 3:26 am Link to this post PM Rigby5
 
Rigby5 Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user

Registered: 04-2005
Location: Mountain Time
Posts: 6799
Karma: -5 (+26/-31)
Reply | Quote
Re: Hillary in the 'News'


Did Hillary ever say that invading Iraq or Afghanistan was a mistake, or that attempting regime change in Libya, Syria, Somalia, Egypt, Syria, Iran, etc. was a mistake?

If she did, I don't remember it.
And if not, then she clearly was the worst candidate of the century.
9/15/2017, 3:33 am Link to this post PM Rigby5
 
Miz Robbie Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user

Registered: 08-2017
Location: Bellingham, WA
Posts: 61
Karma: 1 (+1/-0)
Reply | Quote
Re: Hillary in the 'News'


Rachel Maddow's interview with Hillary Clinton:
Secretary Clinton is on a book promotion tour. This was part of it. There's really nothing much more to say about it.

Rachel asked softball questions. Hillary gave predictable answers. I'm very disappointed.

---
Robbie
9/15/2017, 5:47 am Link to this post PM Miz Robbie Blog
 
snowpixie Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user

Registered: 11-2016
Posts: 1565
Karma: 11 (+15/-4)
Reply | Quote
Re: Hillary in the 'News'


 While she may be retired from seeking public office, i think it's unrealistic to expect her to stay out of the news or politics completely.

this past election year, there was a lot of propaganda. I'm finding it interesting that people can't even stand to listen to her after the election. Just goes to show you
how effective the Russians propaganda machines was.
9/15/2017, 8:22 am Link to this post PM snowpixie Blog
 
Bellelettres Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user

Registered: 11-2008
Posts: 2049
Karma: 11 (+22/-11)
Reply | Quote
Re: Hillary in the 'News'


Rigby, Comey announced that there were hundreds of thousands of e-mails on the Weiner computer, which might cause the FBI to reopen the e-mail investigation. Nobody knew what they might find there.

Here's part of an article from WaPo about this:

FBI Director James B. Comey told Congress last week he found “hundreds and thousands” of Hillary Clinton-related emails from Clinton aide Huma Abedin on Abedin's then-husband and former sexting congressman Anthony Weiner's computer.

It turns out that's wrong. ProPublica and now The Washington Post reported Tuesday that the FBI found a much smaller number of Abedin-Clinton emails on her ex-husband's computer than “hundreds and thousands.”

Besides severely damaging Comey's nonpartisan reputation, here's why the number of emails on Weiner's computer matters: It risks undercutting the FBI's entire reason for notifying Congress 11 days before the election that it had found new information regarding its criminal probe of Clinton.

Top Democrats are pretty sure that letter cost them the election. So to learn that Comey's decision to send it may have rested on far fewer emails than he claims adds rocket fuel to their argument that President Trump didn't win fair and square: Comey helped him by dinging Clinton for no good reason.

http://tinyurl.com/y7tdhops
9/15/2017, 10:37 am Link to this post PM Bellelettres
 
cooter50 Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user

Registered: 11-2016
Posts: 4312
Karma: 2 (+15/-13)
Reply | Quote
Re: Hillary in the 'News'


Belle, had there been 'Nothing' in her email trails to denounce why did she erase them? Why go thru the impetus to create a even larger scandal by denouncing a condition that she created by erasing those 'sensitive' mailings. If she had Nothing to hide as she notes and denoted she should never have removed the emails allowing justice department to inspect them.

She failed, flat plain and simple in attempting to dissuade inspection that publicly made her appear criminal in intent.
9/15/2017, 11:14 am Link to this post PM cooter50 Blog
 
Bellelettres Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user

Registered: 11-2008
Posts: 2049
Karma: 11 (+22/-11)
Reply | Quote
Re: Hillary in the 'News'


She erased personal e-mails, Cooter, not e-mails having to do with State Department work. She was told to do this before she turned the e-mails over to the FBI.
9/15/2017, 12:08 pm Link to this post PM Bellelettres
 
Bellelettres Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user

Registered: 11-2008
Posts: 2049
Karma: 11 (+22/-11)
Reply | Quote
Re: Hillary in the 'News'


Robbie, I had a totally different reaction to the Rachel Maddow interview. I was mesmerized from start to finish.

The first 30 minutes of the 46-minute interview was spent talking about North Korea and the State Department and other aspects of what is going on. It was only in the last quarter of the interview that they talked about Hillary's book. And these were mostly not the usual questions Hillary gets. There was some discussion about the trouble women who run for office have with sexism, but it was by no means same-ole, same-ole. Rachel and Hillary are articulate women with wide minds. All through, the interview was fresh.

At the beginning, Hillary looked depressed, but as they spoke, she regained some of the spark that has always made her a fascinating speaker to me. I can't imagine why anyone is ever bored by her. Maybe because the things that bore them fascinate me, such as deep intelligence in clear language. When Rachel said they would now talk about Comey, I was nervous. OK, I thought, here comes some same-ole, same-ole. Oh me of little faith! Rachel asked Hillary whether, given the way Comey handled revelations about Hillary's e-mail investigation, Hillary thought Comey would be a reliable witness in the Russian investigation. What a question! She also asked whether, if Hillary had been elected, she would have fired Comey.

The interview is on YouTube here:

http://tinyurl.com/yabvdvno
9/15/2017, 12:10 pm Link to this post PM Bellelettres
 
cooter50 Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user

Registered: 11-2016
Posts: 4312
Karma: 2 (+15/-13)
Reply | Quote
Re: Hillary in the 'News'


quote:

Bellelettres wrote:

She erased personal e-mails, Cooter, not e-mails having to do with State Department work. She was told to do this before she turned the e-mails over to the FBI.



Belle, She is trained as a attorney, she understands or understood the articles of evidence as to written documents(even electronic) as such destroying those files PRIOR to release to the FBI while under direction to provide them is destruction of Potential Evidence and as guilty in appearance as burning your private letters in a pile in the yard.

She MAY have been instructed to or she MAY have done the instructing.
9/15/2017, 12:15 pm Link to this post PM cooter50 Blog
 


Add a reply

Page:  1  2  3  4  5 





You are not logged in (login)