Runboard.com
Слава Україні!

runboard.com       Sign up (learn about it) | Sign in (lost password?)

Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7 

 
cooter50 Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user

Registered: 11-2016
Posts: 4312
Karma: 2 (+15/-13)
Reply | Quote
Re: Car Advice


Retrospect:

A brake replacement on my 1999 Ford truck with factory supplied rotors, disc pads(All wheels), and new fastening hardware is less than buying from aftermarket. I can replace those components in less than three hours using conventional tooling while flushing the full load of brake fluid to remove built up contaminants in the lines(brake fluid draws moisture).

My 2010 Impala came due for it's first set of brakes at 128,000 miles. To get the calipers off took more than an hour, to remove the caliper support structure took a acetylene torch to heat the fastener regions, and still require a two foot breaker bar aided with a three foot section of pipe to break 13 and 14mm fine thread fasteners loose. A half inch drive air impact wrench then a three quarter air impact wrench would not even budge the factory installed fasteners.
I spoke to a local garage(Ford dealer), the service rep spoke on how they have to replace these fasteners as they remove them due to over-torque at factory as well excess use of Loc-Tite compounds to retain those fasteners as also noted in my removal of my own hardware. This leads to excess costs by maintenance facilities to do the repairs while the common owner cannot perform said repairs due to lack of appropriate tooling.

Those factors lead us back into costs escalation where the common owner can seldom afford those costly repairs and defer those repairs until the machine just fails fully.
12/29/2016, 3:29 pm Link to this post PM cooter50 Blog
 
mais oui Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user

Registered: 11-2016
Posts: 5097
Karma: 25 (+31/-6)
Reply | Quote
Re: Car Advice


quote:

Cars in all are still undependable



but much better than they used to be, the days of decoking cyl heads are gone most engine gearbox units go for 100 000 miles with only routine maintainance.
 in 40 years of driving in which the family has driven hundreds of thousands of miles we have only once had a significant engine failure - a holed piston and that was in a car which used an engine that was basically 50 years old when they used it (BMC A series).

For a few years I drove around in an ancient 2CV6 (two cyl air cooled 600cc) when I sold it it had damn near 100 000 miles on it and apart from new brake pads, oil and tyres had never had a spanner laid on it - remember this was a 27hp 600cc engine that was working hard just to keep up with city traffic!

obviously the more complexity you build in the more chance that something will fail - if you dont have air con the air con cant fail can it?

we tend to buy bottom of the range cars -without aircon and all that other fancy stuff we dont need it so why pay for it its just something to fail.


---
HAPPINESS, THE IGNOBLE LIFE GOAL OF THE ILLITERATE
12/29/2016, 3:48 pm Link to this post PM mais oui Blog
 
mais oui Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user

Registered: 11-2016
Posts: 5097
Karma: 25 (+31/-6)
Reply | Quote
Re: Car Advice


quote:

still require a two foot breaker bar aided with a three foot section of pipe to break 13 and 14mm fine thread fasteners loose. A half inch drive air impact wrench then a three quarter air impact wrench would not even budge the factory installed fasteners.



M8 and M9 bolts - you were lucky you didnt wring them off

---
HAPPINESS, THE IGNOBLE LIFE GOAL OF THE ILLITERATE
12/29/2016, 4:57 pm Link to this post PM mais oui Blog
 
Rigby5 Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user

Registered: 04-2005
Location: Mountain Time
Posts: 6799
Karma: -5 (+26/-31)
Reply | Quote
Re: Car Advice


quote:

cooter50 wrote:

Retrospect:

A brake replacement on my 1999 Ford truck with factory supplied rotors, disc pads(All wheels), and new fastening hardware is less than buying from aftermarket. I can replace those components in less than three hours using conventional tooling while flushing the full load of brake fluid to remove built up contaminants in the lines(brake fluid draws moisture).

My 2010 Impala came due for it's first set of brakes at 128,000 miles. To get the calipers off took more than an hour, to remove the caliper support structure took a acetylene torch to heat the fastener regions, and still require a two foot breaker bar aided with a three foot section of pipe to break 13 and 14mm fine thread fasteners loose. A half inch drive air impact wrench then a three quarter air impact wrench would not even budge the factory installed fasteners.
I spoke to a local garage(Ford dealer), the service rep spoke on how they have to replace these fasteners as they remove them due to over-torque at factory as well excess use of Loc-Tite compounds to retain those fasteners as also noted in my removal of my own hardware. This leads to excess costs by maintenance facilities to do the repairs while the common owner cannot perform said repairs due to lack of appropriate tooling.

Those factors lead us back into costs escalation where the common owner can seldom afford those costly repairs and defer those repairs until the machine just fails fully.



I had a number of Fiats in the 60's that were incredibly inexpensive, and had timing belts. Never once did I ever even consider replacing the timing belt, and never had to. They were cheaply made, with poor quality materials, but they still lasted at least twice as long as modern vehicles that require far more regular maintenance.
12/29/2016, 6:08 pm Link to this post PM Rigby5
 
Rigby5 Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user

Registered: 04-2005
Location: Mountain Time
Posts: 6799
Karma: -5 (+26/-31)
Reply | Quote
Re: Car Advice


quote:

mais oui wrote:

quote:

Cars in all are still undependable



but much better than they used to be, the days of decoking cyl heads are gone most engine gearbox units go for 100 000 miles with only routine maintainance.
 in 40 years of driving in which the family has driven hundreds of thousands of miles we have only once had a significant engine failure - a holed piston and that was in a car which used an engine that was basically 50 years old when they used it (BMC A series).

For a few years I drove around in an ancient 2CV6 (two cyl air cooled 600cc) when I sold it it had damn near 100 000 miles on it and apart from new brake pads, oil and tyres had never had a spanner laid on it - remember this was a 27hp 600cc engine that was working hard just to keep up with city traffic!

obviously the more complexity you build in the more chance that something will fail - if you dont have air con the air con cant fail can it?

we tend to buy bottom of the range cars -without aircon and all that other fancy stuff we dont need it so why pay for it its just something to fail.




Carbon build up in heads was from drivers not reving the engine enough.
Heads go bad more frequently now because there is no lead in the gas and the EGR causes massive deposits.

Transmissions used to never require any maintenance at all. Now you not only have to change ATF ever 40k, but there is no ATF dipstick, and it takes hours to allow the temperature to come down while it sits on the lift. You are lucky to get 150k on a modern transmission, while in the 70's then just never went bad.

But yes, I agree simplicity means less failures, less expensive repairs, easier diagnostics, etc. A lot of cars these days end up in salvage because no one can figure out how to keep the engine warning light off, in order to pass the annual testing.
12/29/2016, 6:15 pm Link to this post PM Rigby5
 
mais oui Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user

Registered: 11-2016
Posts: 5097
Karma: 25 (+31/-6)
Reply | Quote
Re: Car Advice


Old cars were great werent they?
 who needs disk brakes, rack and pinion steering, pointsless ignition, seats that dont break your neck in an accident, steering columns that dont impale you or windscreens that dont turn you face into steak tartare and wasnt it fun having to fiddle with the choke only to flood the engine and have to wait until it dried out?

Any want to go down the line that model T fords did 100mpg and 100mph? - I have heard that claim made more than once

BTW whats the big deal about no dipstick on the atf filler - you just unscrew the filler if oil doesnt drip out it needs topped up!
(although auto boxes never caught on here)

---
HAPPINESS, THE IGNOBLE LIFE GOAL OF THE ILLITERATE
12/29/2016, 6:45 pm Link to this post PM mais oui Blog
 
cooter50 Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user

Registered: 11-2016
Posts: 4312
Karma: 2 (+15/-13)
Reply | Quote
Re: Car Advice


Not all those illustrious safety features are worth their salt mais oui. Known effect from two cousins in nursing: Seat Belt injuries to aged adults are usually severe enough to cause life threatening injuries, IE Broken Collar Bones, ruptured spleen from broken ribs, neck trauma from failure to keep head still as body stopped. Then the ongoing air bag injuries, if do not keep arms expressly at 10 and 2 the bag forces arm(s) into torso or face, trauma from debris as steering wheel covers harden over lifetime to face, debris from airbag device from crappy design. The list continues from there and I for one do not care to repeat it.

The features being touted to save lives are now causing more incidents. Ignorance or misconception of ABS braking has led to increased tailgating as the drivers "Knew the ABS would stop them in time, was guaranteed" or that the early air bags(only good in frontal impacts) or impact absorbing bumpers(only good to 5mph) would prevent any real injury so disregard for personal requirements as to safe driving and injured with lawsuit against the makers(been on two of these juries). Cannot fix stupid, cannot add enough 'features' to overcome stupid operation nor misconceived notions as to how machines work.
12/29/2016, 8:48 pm Link to this post PM cooter50 Blog
 
Rigby5 Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user

Registered: 04-2005
Location: Mountain Time
Posts: 6799
Karma: -5 (+26/-31)
Reply | Quote
Re: Car Advice


quote:

mais oui wrote:

Old cars were great werent they?
 who needs disk brakes, rack and pinion steering, pointsless ignition, seats that dont break your neck in an accident, steering columns that dont impale you or windscreens that dont turn you face into steak tartare and wasnt it fun having to fiddle with the choke only to flood the engine and have to wait until it dried out?

Any want to go down the line that model T fords did 100mpg and 100mph? - I have heard that claim made more than once

BTW whats the big deal about no dipstick on the atf filler - you just unscrew the filler if oil doesnt drip out it needs topped up!
(although auto boxes never caught on here)



I do like disc brakes, but they were on some cars in the 50s.
I do like rack and pinnion, but Mercedes had a worm and roller box that was smaller and better.
I don't like high back seats because they block vision too much. But I never have had much problems from accidents, so I may be unfair.
I hate breakerless ignition, having had 3 of them go out and require over $400 each time.
Windscreens have not changed since the 1950s.
I like manual chokes.

The lack of ATF dipstick means you have to have a lift or 4 jackstands.
It also means you have to wait til it cools, or the expanded ATF will appear full when not. It also means topping up requires a special pump and not just gravity pour. The filler is in the bottom of the pan, surrounded by a collar above it, on the inside.
I vastly prefer manual transmissions.
12/29/2016, 8:51 pm Link to this post PM Rigby5
 
cooter50 Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user

Registered: 11-2016
Posts: 4312
Karma: 2 (+15/-13)
Reply | Quote
Re: Car Advice


As to the bolts, I have been a mechanic, Certified by US ASE since 1975. I have NEVER had a bolt that on a car a impact wrench would not back out. I have never had to place a cheater onto a breaker bar on anything smaller than a piece of tracked machinery prior to this car and now I am told it is typical of New design.

I was disheartened by what I found as to the bolting. As noted M8 or M9 in 13 and 14mm thread diameter and required more to dislodge than 7/8" diameter bolting on a D8 Caterpillar.

The bolts had been 'Dipped' from tip to base of head in Loctite, that in itself is beyond idiocy, a few drops on the threads being enough to dependably hold them. Repair manual Torque on these bolts(US) was 75-105 foot pounds, by calculation it took almost 800 foot pounds to dislodge them.
12/29/2016, 8:55 pm Link to this post PM cooter50 Blog
 
Rigby5 Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Registered user

Registered: 04-2005
Location: Mountain Time
Posts: 6799
Karma: -5 (+26/-31)
Reply | Quote
Re: Car Advice


quote:

cooter50 wrote:

As to the bolts, I have been a mechanic, Certified by US ASE since 1975. I have NEVER had a bolt that on a car a impact wrench would not back out. I have never had to place a cheater onto a breaker bar on anything smaller than a piece of tracked machinery prior to this car and now I am told it is typical of New design.

I was disheartened by what I found as to the bolting. As noted M8 or M9 in 13 and 14mm thread diameter and required more to dislodge than 7/8" diameter bolting on a D8 Caterpillar.

The bolts had been 'Dipped' from tip to base of head in Loctite, that in itself is beyond idiocy, a few drops on the threads being enough to dependably hold them. Repair manual Torque on these bolts(US) was 75-105 foot pounds, by calculation it took almost 800 foot pounds to dislodge them.



I used to think the old VW van rear axle nuts were bad, but I think they were only like 175 fps or so. Course they usually had been on for 15 or 20 years before I had to take them off.
12/29/2016, 9:57 pm Link to this post PM Rigby5
 


Add a reply

Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7 





You are not logged in (login)