MORE PROFITS from the Mueller Investigation https://bthepoliticalgrilltwo.runboard.com/t4406 Runboard| MORE PROFITS from the Mueller Investigation en-us Fri, 29 Mar 2024 05:44:17 +0000 Fri, 29 Mar 2024 05:44:17 +0000 https://www.runboard.com/ rssfeeds_managingeditor@runboard.com (Runboard.com RSS feeds managing editor) rssfeeds_webmaster@runboard.com (Runboard.com RSS feeds webmaster) akBBS 60 Re: MORE PROFITS from the Mueller Investigationhttps://bthepoliticalgrilltwo.runboard.com/p47526,from=rss#post47526https://bthepoliticalgrilltwo.runboard.com/p47526,from=rss#post47526Not having "confidence" was provided along with the rest of the report of almost 500 pages. it also provided info that sent persons to jail, it also provided evidence that they all lied, that is why Jr., McGahn, etc was called back. It is what stories match what all the liars said the other stories and whose don' matcht. I would say the Trump tower meeting had sod all to do with adoption as Jr. first stated, matter of fact it was the most stupid excuse possibly made and when you lie, you find yourself where they are at.nondisclosed_email@example.com (katie5445)Sun, 16 Jun 2019 01:30:27 +0000 Re: MORE PROFITS from the Mueller Investigationhttps://bthepoliticalgrilltwo.runboard.com/p47512,from=rss#post47512https://bthepoliticalgrilltwo.runboard.com/p47512,from=rss#post47512quote:cooter50 wrote: First off Mueller has MISREPRESENTED US Law by uttering said remark while Not having "Confidence" is not EVIDENCE, and where he stated the Team had failed to make a determination a crime had been committed. OK with US Law the Accused is INNOCENT until PROVED Guilty, NO Determination as to crime committed is EXONERATION under the law. Or are you willing to give away that aspect of law of Innocence until proven guilt? If that principle applies to people outside a courtroom why didn't it apply when people were yelling "lock her up, lock her up?" People on the right didn't seem to have any trouble at all believing Hillary was guilty of all sorts of crimes including murder without any court establishing her guilt. nondisclosed_email@example.com (Philer)Sat, 15 Jun 2019 01:45:55 +0000 Re: MORE PROFITS from the Mueller Investigationhttps://bthepoliticalgrilltwo.runboard.com/p47511,from=rss#post47511https://bthepoliticalgrilltwo.runboard.com/p47511,from=rss#post47511First off Mueller has MISREPRESENTED US Law by uttering said remark while Not having "Confidence" is not EVIDENCE, and where he stated the Team had failed to make a determination a crime had been committed. OK with US Law the Accused is INNOCENT until PROVED Guilty, NO Determination as to crime committed is EXONERATION under the law. Or are you willing to give away that aspect of law of Innocence until proven guilt?nondisclosed_email@example.com (cooter50)Fri, 14 Jun 2019 23:22:46 +0000 Re: MORE PROFITS from the Mueller Investigationhttps://bthepoliticalgrilltwo.runboard.com/p47499,from=rss#post47499https://bthepoliticalgrilltwo.runboard.com/p47499,from=rss#post47499quote:cooter50 wrote: NO you have to be PARANOID or deranged to read INTO that comment. Actually it is plain English.nondisclosed_email@example.com (katie5445)Fri, 14 Jun 2019 01:03:46 +0000 Re: MORE PROFITS from the Mueller Investigationhttps://bthepoliticalgrilltwo.runboard.com/p47495,from=rss#post47495https://bthepoliticalgrilltwo.runboard.com/p47495,from=rss#post47495No. Just no. nondisclosed_email@example.com (Geezesss)Thu, 13 Jun 2019 14:51:36 +0000 Re: MORE PROFITS from the Mueller Investigationhttps://bthepoliticalgrilltwo.runboard.com/p47494,from=rss#post47494https://bthepoliticalgrilltwo.runboard.com/p47494,from=rss#post47494NO you have to be PARANOID or deranged to read INTO that comment.nondisclosed_email@example.com (cooter50)Thu, 13 Jun 2019 01:30:42 +0000 Re: MORE PROFITS from the Mueller Investigationhttps://bthepoliticalgrilltwo.runboard.com/p47482,from=rss#post47482https://bthepoliticalgrilltwo.runboard.com/p47482,from=rss#post47482quote:cooter50 wrote: There was "NO Collusion" as noted by Mr. Mueller or did you Not read that report and the written record of his announcement? He noted his team had no confidence(NOT Evidence) the POTUS did not commit a crime and the VERY NEXT Statement was that the 'Did Not however make a determination the president DID commit a crime. So where is YOUR evidence that Mueller and the FBI and the DoJ investigating staff could NOT find? First I already agreed there was "no collusion" get over that bit. He stated, "If we had confidence that the president had NOT committed a crime, we would have said so." You'd have to be deaf, dumb and blind to not know what that meant!nondisclosed_email@example.com (katie5445)Wed, 12 Jun 2019 01:47:30 +0000 Re: MORE PROFITS from the Mueller Investigationhttps://bthepoliticalgrilltwo.runboard.com/p47453,from=rss#post47453https://bthepoliticalgrilltwo.runboard.com/p47453,from=rss#post47453"He "Stated" everything he had was "in his report" ... which is too long and complex for Trump or his supporters to read , right ? Here: “While this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.” “The evidence supports the inference that the President intended (former campaign Chairman Paul) Manafort to believe that he could receive a pardon, which would make cooperation with the government as a means of obtaining a lesser sentence unnecessary.” “You gotta do this. You gotta call Rod ...,” Trump told former White House Counsel Donald McGahn during a June 17, 2017, phone call in which he asked McGahn to remove Mueller due to conflicts of interest. “Call Rod, tell Rod that Mueller has conflicts and can’t be the Special Counsel,” Trump said during a second phone call that same day. “Mueller has to go. ... Call me back when you do it.” “I don’t have a lawyer,” Trump told aides on March 3, 2017, the day after learning that Attorney General Jeff Sessions had recused himself from the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election. “You’re telling me that Bobby “While this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.” “The evidence supports the inference that the President intended (former campaign Chairman Paul) Manafort to believe that he could receive a pardon, which would make cooperation with the government as a means of obtaining a lesser sentence unnecessary.” “You gotta do this. You gotta call Rod ...,” Trump told former White House Counsel Donald McGahn during a June 17, 2017, phone call in which he asked McGahn to remove Mueller due to conflicts of interest. “Call Rod, tell Rod that Mueller has conflicts and can’t be the Special Counsel,” Trump said during a second phone call that same day. “Mueller has to go. ... Call me back when you do it.” “I don’t have a lawyer,” Trump told aides on March 3, 2017, the day after learning that Attorney General Jeff Sessions had recused himself from the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election. “You’re telling me that Bobby (Kennedy) and Jack (Kennedy didn’t talk about investigations? Or Obama didn’t tell Eric (Attorney General Eric) Holder who to investigate?” Trump asked McGahn in connection with frustration over Sessions’ recusal. “Can you look into this? Don’t want to get duped but don’t want to blow off Putin!” - former Trump campaign secretary Hope Hicks, in an email to Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner, after receiving an email from a Russian Embassy official with the subject line “Message from Putin.” “If he doesn’t write a letter, then maybe I’ll have to get rid of him,” - Trump, telling Staff Secretary Rob Porter that he would fire White House Counsel McGahn if McGahn refused to craft a memo stating that Trump never directed him to fire Special Counsel Robert Mueller. Trump also called McGahn a “lying bastard,” according to Porter’s account. “Keep in touch with your friend.” - Trump, in directing Porter to keep in touch with former Associate Attorney General Rachel Brand to see if she might be interested in becoming attorney general and overseeing Mueller’s probe. Porter later told prosecutors he never delivered the message because he was uncomfortable. “I never said to fire Mueller. I never said ‘fire.’ This story doesn’t look good. You need to correct this. You’re the White House counsel.” - Trump, complaining to McGahn about a New York Times story revealing that Trump asked McGahn to fire Mueller. McGahn declined to do so, saying the story was accurate.nondisclosed_email@example.com (Geezesss)Sun, 09 Jun 2019 18:29:57 +0000 Re: MORE PROFITS from the Mueller Investigationhttps://bthepoliticalgrilltwo.runboard.com/p47449,from=rss#post47449https://bthepoliticalgrilltwo.runboard.com/p47449,from=rss#post47449He "Stated" everything he had was "in his report", if not there was not going to be forthcoming as NOT left out, which was a lie as he has been caught leaving a KEY witness testimony out. So go fish as the water is gone and no fish left to snag.nondisclosed_email@example.com (cooter50)Sat, 08 Jun 2019 20:45:38 +0000 Re: MORE PROFITS from the Mueller Investigationhttps://bthepoliticalgrilltwo.runboard.com/p47442,from=rss#post47442https://bthepoliticalgrilltwo.runboard.com/p47442,from=rss#post47442So in other words, he said what is not, in itself, a crime, was not committed, but what did he say about obstruction of justice, which is a crime ? Do you know ? nondisclosed_email@example.com (Geezesss)Sat, 08 Jun 2019 18:21:50 +0000 Re: MORE PROFITS from the Mueller Investigationhttps://bthepoliticalgrilltwo.runboard.com/p47432,from=rss#post47432https://bthepoliticalgrilltwo.runboard.com/p47432,from=rss#post47432There was "NO Collusion" as noted by Mr. Mueller or did you Not read that report and the written record of his announcement? He noted his team had no confidence(NOT Evidence) the POTUS did not commit a crime and the VERY NEXT Statement was that the 'Did Not however make a determination the president DID commit a crime. So where is YOUR evidence that Mueller and the FBI and the DoJ investigating staff could NOT find?nondisclosed_email@example.com (cooter50)Sat, 08 Jun 2019 13:31:16 +0000 Re: MORE PROFITS from the Mueller Investigationhttps://bthepoliticalgrilltwo.runboard.com/p47429,from=rss#post47429https://bthepoliticalgrilltwo.runboard.com/p47429,from=rss#post47429Collusion can or not be a crime, what Trump was accused of. was a crime. Is there something conservatives do not understand by Muellers statement" if we had confidence the president did NOT commit a crime we would have said so." Explain that away Cooter with some faux English."Cad" in the room, hey I like a good laugh as well, this isnt it.nondisclosed_email@example.com (katie5445)Sat, 08 Jun 2019 07:26:14 +0000 Re: MORE PROFITS from the Mueller Investigationhttps://bthepoliticalgrilltwo.runboard.com/p47413,from=rss#post47413https://bthepoliticalgrilltwo.runboard.com/p47413,from=rss#post47413cooter, learn something about the law before you make statements like that. Collusion is not a crime. However, obstructing justice is. And any number of prosecutors have said that if Trump was not the sitting President he would have been charged.nondisclosed_email@example.com (shiftless2)Fri, 07 Jun 2019 17:57:01 +0000 Re: MORE PROFITS from the Mueller Investigationhttps://bthepoliticalgrilltwo.runboard.com/p47412,from=rss#post47412https://bthepoliticalgrilltwo.runboard.com/p47412,from=rss#post47412Depends on whose "facts" you accept. Trump by anyone's morals/ethics is a liar as well as those who are loyal to him instead of the country. Those with honour, resign or are fired are putting the country first. We are past collusion but not obstruction which is obvious. If he is lucky enough to avoid impeachment which in a democracy, he'd be gone a long time ago. If it fails there is still NY state, the orange hair will be wearing matching orange suit and Melania will finally be free. The profit will be for America. I know it's hard for the right wing to think about anything but their pocketbook and agenda but there are things more important. nondisclosed_email@example.com (katie5445)Fri, 07 Jun 2019 16:44:52 +0000 Re: MORE PROFITS from the Mueller Investigationhttps://bthepoliticalgrilltwo.runboard.com/p47395,from=rss#post47395https://bthepoliticalgrilltwo.runboard.com/p47395,from=rss#post47395I just dearly enjoy a GOOD Laugh at the moronic attitude of 'The Leftists'. Mueller did not start his "Investigation" until MAY 2017, significant in that fact $MILLIONS were already being spent By none other than Comey, the FBI, DoJ Rosenstein and OTHER Investigative department staff. The entire debacle will MAYBE and just MAYBE after the Properties "Auctions" (not sales) as is done with federally appropriated properties, they MAYBE will break even. Mueller's team was essentially COMPLETE as to NO Collusion as early as MID2018, but had their teeth on other designs and could NOT come up with evidence to justify anything else. There IS and Will NOT be any 'Profit' as to this mess. https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/russia-probe-timeline-moscow-mueller/story?id=57427441 https://finance.yahoo.com/news/cost-mueller-investigation-171000076.htmlnondisclosed_email@example.com (cooter50)Thu, 06 Jun 2019 20:01:40 +0000 Re: MORE PROFITS from the Mueller Investigationhttps://bthepoliticalgrilltwo.runboard.com/p47394,from=rss#post47394https://bthepoliticalgrilltwo.runboard.com/p47394,from=rss#post47394Nor to a POTUS who has left office. nondisclosed_email@example.com (Geezesss)Thu, 06 Jun 2019 17:49:11 +0000 Re: MORE PROFITS from the Mueller Investigationhttps://bthepoliticalgrilltwo.runboard.com/p47390,from=rss#post47390https://bthepoliticalgrilltwo.runboard.com/p47390,from=rss#post47390quote:... the German govt. is on it and they will find out. It's worth remembering that the DOJ policy re indicting a sitting President is an American one and doesn't apply to foreign governments.nondisclosed_email@example.com (shiftless2)Thu, 06 Jun 2019 11:46:12 +0000 Re: MORE PROFITS from the Mueller Investigationhttps://bthepoliticalgrilltwo.runboard.com/p47387,from=rss#post47387https://bthepoliticalgrilltwo.runboard.com/p47387,from=rss#post47387They will find out, the German govt. is on it and they will find out. Last month several other banks and private homes were raided. I read Capitol One is also alleged to be involved. Money laundering, tax evasion and very funky loans as early as 2001. nondisclosed_email@example.com (katie5445)Wed, 05 Jun 2019 17:43:58 +0000 Re: MORE PROFITS from the Mueller Investigationhttps://bthepoliticalgrilltwo.runboard.com/p47379,from=rss#post47379https://bthepoliticalgrilltwo.runboard.com/p47379,from=rss#post47379The question goes beyond what happened between him and Deustche Bank and extends to what happened on the bank's "back door". That is, what was the original source of the funds? nondisclosed_email@example.com (shiftless2)Tue, 04 Jun 2019 18:55:28 +0000 Re: MORE PROFITS from the Mueller Investigationhttps://bthepoliticalgrilltwo.runboard.com/p47363,from=rss#post47363https://bthepoliticalgrilltwo.runboard.com/p47363,from=rss#post47363I would love to see what went on with him and Deutsch Bank.nondisclosed_email@example.com (katie5445)Tue, 04 Jun 2019 03:18:27 +0000 Re: MORE PROFITS from the Mueller Investigationhttps://bthepoliticalgrilltwo.runboard.com/p47348,from=rss#post47348https://bthepoliticalgrilltwo.runboard.com/p47348,from=rss#post47348quote:Tombstone1881 wrote: Even taking Trump at his new high estimate of $40 million being the cost of the investigation, it would mean that Mueller has turned a profit of $32 to $35 million. It's another win for the American taxpayer. Truth and justice wins in the end. And I'm sure there's more to come as the other investigations progress. A very long and detailed list can be found here numerous live links there as wellnondisclosed_email@example.com (shiftless2)Sun, 02 Jun 2019 11:06:05 +0000 Re: MORE PROFITS from the Mueller Investigationhttps://bthepoliticalgrilltwo.runboard.com/p47342,from=rss#post47342https://bthepoliticalgrilltwo.runboard.com/p47342,from=rss#post47342Good luck with those figures, I suspect a Cad in the room playing $$$ figure games.nondisclosed_email@example.com (cooter50)Sat, 01 Jun 2019 20:38:22 +0000 MORE PROFITS from the Mueller Investigationhttps://bthepoliticalgrilltwo.runboard.com/p47322,from=rss#post47322https://bthepoliticalgrilltwo.runboard.com/p47322,from=rss#post47322Mueller keeps raking in money from his investigation into the Swamp Creatures who have been using the US Treasury as their own piggy bank. You and me and every other tax paying American citizen are now proud owners of Condo 43-G in Trump Tower. It is valued at $42-$45 million dollars. New York will be putting it up for auction very shortly. It was surrendered in a plea deal form Manafort to have some of his other criminal charges dropped. Between that, and the $35 million dollars already recovered from Manafort, that means the Mueller investigation will have recovered between $77 to $75 million dollars so far, and it's still not over. Even taking Trump at his new high estimate of $40 million being the cost of the investigation, it would mean that Mueller has turned a profit of $32 to $35 million. It's another win for the American taxpayer. Truth and justice wins in the end.nondisclosed_email@example.com (Tombstone1881)Fri, 31 May 2019 01:31:20 +0000